Which measure is not typically used to evaluate the effectiveness of restorative justice?

The measure that is not typically used to evaluate the effectiveness of restorative justice is offender satisfaction. In restorative justice, the primary focus is on repairing harm and addressing the needs of victims, as well as reintegrating offenders into the community. Evaluating effectiveness often involves analyzing the impact on victims and the community, which is why metrics like victim satisfaction and payment of restitution are relevant.

Victim satisfaction helps assess if the restorative process meets the emotional and practical needs of those affected by the crime, while payment of restitution directly addresses reparations for the harm done. Recidivism rates are also significant as they indicate whether restorative practices contribute to reducing re-offending among offenders.

In contrast, while understanding an offender's perspective can be valuable, offender satisfaction is not a primary metric of success within restorative justice frameworks. The overall goal is not to ensure offenders feel satisfied but to promote accountability and healing for victims and the community.