Which of the following changes has emerged to save Intensive Supervision Programs from extinction?

The correct answer involves the combination of two effective strategies: integrating intensive supervision programs (ISP) with cognitive-behavioral treatment and selecting high-risk offenders for ISP.

Combining intensive supervision with cognitive-behavioral treatment enhances the effectiveness of ISPs by addressing the underlying thought patterns and behaviors of offenders. This treatment approach has been shown to reduce recidivism rates by equipping individuals with skills to manage their thoughts and behaviors positively, while the intensive supervision component provides the necessary oversight to encourage compliance and support rehabilitation.

Choosing high-risk offenders for ISPs allows resources to be allocated more effectively to those individuals who pose a greater risk of reoffending. This focus ensures that the programs are directed towards those who are most likely to benefit from intensive supervision and intervention, thereby improving overall program effectiveness and outcomes.

By implementing both of these changes, ISPs can adapt to modern correctional strategies, retain their relevance in community corrections, and demonstrate success in achieving their rehabilitation goals. The combination not only maximizes the impact on recidivism but also supports the sustainability of these programs, which may otherwise fall into disuse if deemed ineffective.