Which of the following is not a criticism of house arrest?

House arrest, often seen as a form of community corrections, is critiqued for several reasons, but the assertion that it is expensive for the county or state to operate stands out as not fitting within the typical criticisms of this correctional method.

House arrest typically incurs lower costs compared to incarceration in a prison or jail setting. While there are monitoring costs associated with house arrest, they generally do not exceed the financial burden of maintaining a facility for numerous inmates. Consequently, this makes the viewpoint that it is overly expensive less valid compared to other points raised regarding potential risks and implications for offenders.

In contrast, concerns about domestic violence highlight the potential for dangerous situations when individuals are confined at home, particularly if they are not adequately monitored. The possibility of continued criminal activity within the home setting addresses the fear that house arrest might not be a sufficient deterrent for some offenders, while the perception of house arrest as less serious than incarceration relates to its effectiveness as a punishment. These other factors contribute to a larger conversation about the efficiency and safety of house arrest as a correctional strategy.