Which of the following is NOT typically a use case for GPS tracking?

GPS tracking is commonly utilized in various contexts within community corrections, particularly for monitoring individuals who may pose a higher risk to society or who have specific rehabilitation needs.

In the context of monitoring sex offenders, GPS tracking serves as a preventive tool to ensure compliance with designated restrictions, such as keeping a certain distance from schools or parks. Similarly, supervising drug offenders can involve GPS tracking to ensure adherence to curfews or geographical limitations, aiding in their rehabilitation while simultaneously protecting the community.

Observing high-risk criminals also employs GPS technology to maintain oversight and prevent potential criminal activities during their reintegration into society. This ensures that authorities can respond quickly should an individual stray into prohibited areas.

Tracking traffic violators typically does not fall under the common use cases for GPS tracking in community corrections. Traffic violations are often less serious in nature and do not usually necessitate the same level of monitoring as offenders who have been classified as high-risk or who are under more stringent supervision requirements. Thus, while GPS technology is valuable in various correctional strategies, its application in tracking traffic violators is not typically justified or prioritized.