Which practice assumes that family and extended family should remain part of the decision-making in domestic violence cases?

Family Group Conferencing is a practice rooted in restorative justice principles that emphasizes the involvement of families and community members in decision-making processes, particularly in sensitive cases such as domestic violence. This approach recognizes the importance of familial relationships and the potential for family support systems to contribute positively to the resolution of conflicts and rehabilitation of offenders.

In Family Group Conferencing, a facilitated meeting is typically organized that includes the victim, the offender, and their respective family members and supporters. This collaborative environment allows all voices to be heard and encourages collective problem-solving, enabling families to participate directly in creating solutions that are beneficial for everyone involved.

This practice is particularly valuable in domestic violence cases because it acknowledges the complexity of family dynamics and the need for a comprehensive approach that safeguards the interests of victims while considering the context of familial ties. By prioritizing family input, this method can facilitate healing and promote accountability within a community-centric framework.

The other options, such as Citizen's Advisory Boards, Boards of Directors, and Quality Circle Thinking, do not specifically focus on the direct involvement of families in domestic violence decision-making. Instead, they pertain to broader organizational processes, governance, or improvement initiatives, which are not tailored to the unique needs seen in domestic violence situations.