Why is electronic monitoring used more frequently than GPS monitoring at present?

The use of electronic monitoring is more prevalent than GPS monitoring primarily due to cost considerations. Electronic monitoring generally involves simpler technology and lower installation and maintenance expenses compared to GPS systems, which may require more sophisticated infrastructure and ongoing service costs. Lower operational costs make electronic monitoring a more accessible option for many correctional agencies, especially in environments where budget constraints are a significant concern.

While factors such as privacy concerns, punitive effects, and public support do play roles in shaping the implementation of various monitoring technologies, they do not have the same level of impact on the frequency of adoption as cost does. Privacy concerns may limit the extent of certain types of monitoring but do not directly influence the operational feasibility or choice of technology from a budgetary standpoint. Similarly, while some individuals may prefer certain methods due to perceived punitive effects or public opinion, these considerations are secondary to the fundamental issue of financial feasibility in a community corrections context.